Stockalyze
Example report. Sign up to run the same analysis on any ticker.
XOM logoXOMEquity research

Report date: 2026-07-16

$163.54+0.27 (+0.17%)Live · delayed quote, informational only

Analysis focus

Provide a balanced, comprehensive analysis: fundamentals and valuation, the Wall Street view, technical posture, and the key forward risks and catalysts.

Summary

ExxonMobil enters mid-July 2026 at roughly $144.51 (July 15 close, up 4.47% that session) with a ~$599B market cap and ~$638B enterprise value, after a +46.6% 12-month price run but an ~18% pullback from the $176.41 52-week high [6][7][18]. The strongest bull case is threefold: (1) underlying earnings are healthier than the headline — Q1 2026 adjusted EPS of $1.16 beat the ~$1.00$1.07 consensus, with the weaker $1.00 GAAP figure depressed by ~$3.88B of unfavorable mark-to-market derivative timing and a $706M Middle East supply-disruption loss, both identified one-time/timing items rather than recurring operating weakness [8][15]; (2) valuation looks reasonable on normalized earnings — the forward P/E of ~11.7 sits near the ~13.3 five-year average even though the trailing ~24.3x optically screens expensive, and BofA's June 16 upgrade to Buy ($154 target) argued the stock already prices in $65/bbl long-term Brent with ~$3.3B of incremental Permian FCF at $70 Brent [2][5][17]; and (3) capital returns are large — a $4.12/share dividend (2.85% yield, Q2 declared at $1.03) plus a planned $20B of 2026 buybacks [16]. The strongest bear case: revenue fell ~7.6% year over year in Q1 [8]; the combined ~$37B dividend-plus-buyback outlay far exceeds $18.79B of TTM free cash flow, implying reliance on balance-sheet capacity (net debt $39.23B) or a forward cash-flow recovery [9][16]; XOM's EV/EBITDA (~11.4x) runs above Chevron's (~10.5x) while its 2.85% yield trails CVX's 3.92% [3]; and the quarter demonstrated real earnings sensitivity to geopolitical supply shocks, with the early-July slide to $136$141 driven by Brent falling to ~$85 as the Strait of Hormuz reopened [15][19]. The Wall Street picture is constructive but low-conviction. Ratings skew positive with no major downgrades in 90 days — the only rating change was BofA's upgrade — yet at least five large firms (JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, TD Cowen, Citi, Mizuho) cut price targets, consistent with lower oil-price decks rather than lost conviction in Exxon specifically [11][13]. Hold is the single largest bucket (12 of 24 on stockanalysis.com's panel; TipRanks shows Moderate Buy on 14 Buy/6 Hold) [4], and the dispersion is unusual: targets span $130$185 (~42% spread), average-target figures disagree materially across trackers ($152.43 to ~$173), and the freshest marks are internally split — the two highest targets (RBC $180, Mizuho $170) carry Hold ratings while lower targets (JPMorgan $158) carry Buy [1][10][12]. The nominal ~16% consensus upside to the $168.10 average target should therefore be treated cautiously [1][10]. Technically, the stock rebounded off the $136.00$137.81 support zone and 200-day moving average (a historically bullish signal per Schaeffer's), now sits just below the $146.44$147.01 resistance band with $163.68 as the next upside reference, RSI recovered from 35.6 to ~67.5 (neutral), and MACD turned positive July 7 [20][21][22][23]. Bottom line on what would change the conclusion: the dominant swing factor is the long-term Brent assumption ($65 vs $70+/bbl) — sustained crude strength or weakness would move targets mechanically [13]. The near-term test is Q2 2026 earnings on July 31 (consensus ~$3.56 EPS on ~$98.7B revenue), where Exxon itself has signaled oil-price changes would add $3.5$3.9B to upstream earnings — a print that would confirm or refute the above-consensus EPS models banks like JPMorgan are carrying [13][14]. Beyond oil, watch whether the Q1 derivative timing losses reverse in coming quarters (which would rapidly normalize the trailing P/E toward the forward ~11.7x) and whether free cash flow recovers enough to cover the ~$37B shareholder-return commitment without further balance-sheet draw [2][9][16]. Bulls need the adjusted-earnings trajectory and Permian FCF growth to validate the forward multiple; bears need revenue contraction and the FCF-vs-payout gap to persist into a softer crude tape.

Findings (23)

The Street's target dispersion is unusually wide — $130 to $185, a ~42% spread — and average-target figures disagree materially across trackers ($152.43 on one 29-analyst panel vs. $168.10 on stockanalysis.com's 24-analyst panel vs. ~$171.84–$173.13 elsewhere), so any single 'consensus upside' number should be treated cautiously.

High confidence

The $130 low and $185 high are shown on stockanalysis.com; MarketBeat-sourced search results cite a $152.43 consensus on 29 analysts while public.com/TipRanks-linked results cite averages of $167.38–$173.13 on 20–31 analysts. The disagreement reflects different analyst pools and staleness windows, and the recent wave of target cuts (JPM, MS, Citi, Mizuho, TD Cowen) means older, higher targets inflate some averages.

XOM's trailing P/E is about 24.3 versus a forward P/E of about 11.7, with P/B of 2.35 and EV/EBITDA of roughly 11.4-11.8; the wide trailing-vs-forward gap reflects trailing EPS ($5.94 TTM) depressed by large one-time derivative timing losses rather than expected earnings collapse.

High confidence

stockanalysis.com lists trailing P/E 24.33, forward P/E 11.69, P/B 2.35, EV/EBITDA 11.39, and TTM EPS $5.94; the Q1 2026 10-Q coverage documents the ~$3.9B unfavorable mark-to-market derivative timing effect that depresses trailing GAAP earnings.

Versus peer Chevron (CVX: ~$181.60, $359.1B market cap), XOM trades at a lower trailing P/E (24.3 vs 31.6) but a higher EV/EBITDA (11.4 vs 10.5) and slightly higher forward P/E (11.69 vs 11.39), while offering a materially lower dividend yield (2.85% vs 3.92%).

High confidence

stockanalysis.com statistics pages for both tickers, fetched July 16, 2026, show CVX at trailing P/E 31.59, forward P/E 11.39, EV/EBITDA 10.53, yield 3.92% versus XOM's 24.33 / 11.69 / 11.39 / 2.85% — both majors carry one-time-item-inflated trailing multiples.

The consensus rating skews positive but is not uniformly bullish: stockanalysis.com's 24-analyst breakdown is 8 Strong Buy, 3 Buy, 12 Hold, 0 Sell, and 1 Strong Sell, while TipRanks shows a 'Moderate Buy' on 14 Buy, 6 Hold, and 0 Sell ratings.

High confidence

Both aggregators independently show a Buy-tilted consensus with a large Hold contingent — Holds are the single largest bucket (12 of 24) in the stockanalysis.com panel, indicating the Street is constructive but far from unanimous.

Bank of America upgraded XOM from Neutral to Buy on June 16, 2026 with a $154 price target, with analyst Jean Ann Salisbury arguing the pullback lets the stock price in $65/bbl long-term Brent with minimal fundamental downside ('Deal or no deal, we like the valuation for XOM here').

High confidence

Multiple secondary outlets report the June 16, 2026 BofA upgrade, the $154 objective, the $65/bbl Brent framing, and cited ~$3.3B of incremental Permian free cash flow at $70/bbl Brent as a supporting factor. Note the $154 target is a below-consensus, valuation-driven upgrade — only ~6.6% above the $144.51 price.

XOM closed at approximately $144.51–$145.09 on July 15, 2026, after surging 4.47% that session, within a 52-week range of $105.53–$176.41 and a market cap of roughly $599 billion.

High confidence

stockanalysis.com showed a previous close of $144.51 (pre-market $144.06 on July 16) with a 52-week range of $105.53–$176.41 and $598.92B market cap; JournalArta reported the July 15 close at $145.09, up 4.47%.

As of July 16, 2026, XOM trades at approximately $144.51 (July 15 close), giving a market capitalization of about $599B and an enterprise value of about $638B on roughly 4.14 billion shares outstanding, after a +46.6% run over the past 52 weeks.

High confidence

stockanalysis.com's statistics page fetched July 16, 2026 shows price $144.51, market cap $598.92B, enterprise value $638.14B, 4.14B shares, and +46.55% 52-week change (an intraday search quote showed $144.96 / $601.32B, consistent within a day's move).

In Q1 2026 ExxonMobil reported revenue of roughly $83-85B (down ~7.6% year over year), GAAP net income of $4.18B ($1.00 EPS), and adjusted earnings of $4.9B ($1.16 EPS), beating consensus of roughly $1.00-$1.07.

Medium confidence

Multiple 10-Q summaries agree on $4.18B GAAP net income / $1.00 EPS and $4.9B / $1.16 adjusted; confidence is medium because secondary sources differ slightly on revenue ($83.16B vs $85.14B) and the SEC 8-K itself could not be fetched directly (403).

Bottom-line framing supported by the data: the bull case rests on an adjusted Q1 EPS beat ($1.16 vs ~$1.00-1.07 consensus), ~$19B TTM FCF funding a $4.12 dividend plus $20B buybacks, and a forward P/E (~11.7) near historical norms; the bear case rests on revenue down ~7.6% YoY, trailing multiples (P/E ~24x, EV/EBITDA ~11.4x) well above the 5-year P/E average of ~13.3 and above Chevron's EV/EBITDA, a payout ratio near 69% of trailing GAAP EPS, and demonstrated earnings sensitivity to geopolitical supply disruptions — the conclusion would change materially on oil-price direction, whether the derivative timing losses reverse in coming quarters, and whether FCF sustains the combined ~$37B dividend-plus-buyback outlay.

Medium confidence

Each component number (adjusted beat, FCF, buyback plan, multiples, revenue decline, payout ratio, peer comparison) is individually sourced in the findings above; this synthesizes them into balanced bull/bear framing without a recommendation. Note dividend ($4.12/yr on 4.14B shares ≈ $17B) plus $20B buybacks totals ~$37B versus $18.79B TTM FCF, implying reliance on balance-sheet capacity or higher forward cash flow.

As of the July 15, 2026 close, XOM traded at $144.51, and the 24-analyst consensus 12-month price target is $168.10 (median $168), implying roughly 16% upside, with a high target of $185 and a low of $130.

High confidence

stockanalysis.com's forecast page shows a $144.51 close on Jul 15, 2026 and an average target of $168.1 (+16.32%), median $168, high $185 (+28.02%), low $130 (-10.04%) across 24 analysts. This is a secondary aggregator; target averages vary by tracker (TipRanks and MarketBeat show averages between roughly $152 and $173 depending on analyst pool).

Several major banks cut XOM targets in the last 90 days while keeping constructive ratings: Morgan Stanley maintained Overweight but lowered its target from $171 to $168 on June 29, 2026, and JPMorgan (Arun Jayaram) trimmed its target from $173 to $158 while staying Overweight, still modeling adjusted EPS slightly above consensus.

Medium confidence

GuruFocus reports the Morgan Stanley Overweight/$168 action dated June 29, 2026; stockanalysis.com lists JPMorgan's Buy-equivalent $158 target as of July 14, 2026, and MarketBeat-sourced coverage notes JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, TD Cowen, Citi, and Mizuho all cut targets while mostly keeping Overweight/Buy/Neutral stances. Confidence is medium because the JPMorgan prior target ($173) comes only from secondary aggregators.

The freshest big-bank marks (July 8–15, 2026) versus the $144.51 price are: Wells Fargo (Sam Margolin) Buy $185 (+28%), Barclays Overweight $182 (raised from $163, +26%), RBC Hold $180 (+25%), Mizuho Hold $170 (+18%), JPMorgan Buy $158 (+9%), Goldman Sachs (Neil Mehta) Hold $157 (+9%), and Citi reaffirmed Neutral on July 8.

Medium confidence

stockanalysis.com's recent-ratings table dates Wells Fargo $185 and RBC $180 to Jul 9, Mizuho $170 to Jul 13, JPMorgan $158 to Jul 14, and Goldman $157 to Jul 15, 2026; MarketBeat-linked coverage reports the Barclays $163→$182 Overweight raise and Citi's July 8 Neutral reaffirmation. Upside percentages are computed against the $144.51 Jul 15 close. Confidence is medium because all points are from secondary aggregators, and note the split: the two highest targets on the Street ($180 RBC, $170 Mizuho) carry Hold ratings while lower targets (JPM $158) carry Buy — a sign of low conviction dispersion, not a clean bull/bear divide.

The net Wall Street picture as of July 16, 2026 is a downgrade-free but target-compressing quarter: the only major rating change in the last 90 days was an upgrade (BofA to Buy, June 16), zero major banks moved to Sell, yet at least five large firms cut price targets, consistent with analysts lowering oil-price decks rather than losing conviction in Exxon specifically.

Medium confidence

Search coverage shows JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, TD Cowen, Citi, and Mizuho all cut XOM targets while keeping Overweight/Buy/Neutral stances, and JPMorgan explicitly kept EPS estimates above Exxon's own guidance midpoint despite the cut. This synthesis is medium confidence because it aggregates several secondary sources rather than one primary tally. For the user's bottom-line framing: the bull case per the Street is valuation (BofA: downside protected even at $65 Brent; Barclays $182) and Permian FCF growth (~$3.3B incremental at $70 Brent); the bear case is that even bulls cut targets ~$10–15 on weaker oil decks and the largest rating bucket is Hold; the swing factor analysts cite is the long-term Brent assumption ($65 vs $70+/bbl) — sustained crude strength or weakness would move targets mechanically, and Q2 2026 earnings (oil-windfall-lifted per July 13 coverage) is the near-term catalyst that would confirm or refute the above-consensus EPS models.

The most immediate catalysts are Q2 2026 earnings due July 31 (consensus ~$3.56 EPS on ~$98.7B revenue) and Exxon's own signal that oil price changes would boost Q2 upstream earnings by $3.5–$3.9 billion, which helped drive the mid-July rally; Q1 2026 earnings were $4.2 billion ($1.00/share) per the company's press release.

Medium confidence

ExxonMobil's official investor-relations release reported Q1 2026 earnings of $4.2B ($1.00 per share); aggregator coverage cited the July 31 Q2 report with ~$3.56 EPS consensus and the company's guidance that oil price moves would add $3.5–$3.9B to upstream earnings, alongside the Texas redomicile and the $20B buyback program as secondary watch items.

Q1 2026 GAAP results were distorted by large identified/one-time items: approximately $3.88B of unfavorable mark-to-market timing on unsettled derivatives and a $706M loss tied to Middle East supply disruptions, which drove a $1.3B Energy Products segment loss — meaning the adjusted $1.16 EPS beat, not the $1.00 GAAP figure, better reflects underlying operations.

Medium confidence

10-Q summaries specify the $3.88B unfavorable derivative timing effect ($3.33B within Energy Products) and $706M Middle East supply-disruption loss as identified items excluded from the $4.9B adjusted earnings; these are timing/one-off effects, not recurring operating losses.

ExxonMobil generated $18.79B of trailing-twelve-month free cash flow ($47.72B operating cash flow minus $28.93B capex) against total debt of $47.66B and net debt of $39.23B, and pays a $4.12/share annual dividend (~2.85% yield, ~69% payout of depressed TTM GAAP EPS), with the Q2 2026 dividend declared at $1.03/share alongside a planned $20B of 2026 share repurchases.

Medium confidence

stockanalysis.com lists FCF $18.79B, OCF $47.72B, capex $28.93B, total debt $47.66B, net debt $39.23B, dividend $4.12 (2.85% yield, 68.7% payout); Q1 filing coverage confirms the $1.03/share quarterly declaration and $20B 2026 buyback plan. No dividend cut is indicated; the $1.03 quarterly rate implies continuation of Exxon's annual raise cadence.

XOM's current trailing P/E of ~24.3 sits far above its ~13.3 five-year average P/E, though the forward multiple of ~11.7 is much closer to that historical norm — indicating the headline 'expensive vs history' reading is largely an artifact of one-time-depressed trailing earnings plus a 46% one-year share-price rally.

Medium confidence

fullratio's XOM page (via search results) cites a 5-year average P/E of 13.29 versus the current ~24.3-24.4 trailing multiple; the direct page fetch returned 403, so the 5-year figure rests on the search excerpt rather than a verified page read, capping confidence at medium.

XOM has returned approximately +26.3% over the trailing 12 months, though it has pulled back sharply from its 52-week high of $176.41 set earlier in 2026.

Medium confidence

MarketBeat's chart/price-history data showed a 26.33% 1-year increase; stockanalysis.com confirms the $176.41 52-week high versus a current price in the mid-$140s (roughly 18% below that high). A precise 6-month return figure was not directly published in the sources reviewed.

The decline from the mid-$150s to the $136–$141 range in late June/early July 2026 was driven primarily by Brent crude falling to roughly $85 per barrel after the Strait of Hormuz reopened following a ceasefire memorandum.

Medium confidence

FX Leaders' July 2 coverage tied XOM's slide toward key support to the crude retreat as the Hormuz reopening deflated the geopolitical risk premium; Traders Union noted the stock remained supported above its 200-day moving average through the pullback.

Key near-term support sits in the $136.00–$137.81 zone (accumulated-volume support), reinforced by the 200-day moving average, which Schaeffer's flagged on July 1 as a historically bullish bounce signal for XOM.

Medium confidence

StockInvest.us identified accumulated-volume support at $137.81 and support at $136.00; Schaeffer's Investment Research noted shares were testing the 200-day moving average, a level that has historically preceded positive forward returns for the stock.

Near-term resistance stands at $146.44–$147.01, and a decisive break above that band would open a path toward the three-month high of $163.68.

Medium confidence

StockInvest.us cited accumulated-volume resistance at $146.44; JournalArta's July 15 analysis centered the technical battle on the $147.01 resistance level with $163.68 as the next upside reference — the July 15 close (~$145) sits just below this band.

RSI(14) fell to 35.58 (approaching oversold) around July 2 and rebounded to roughly 67.5 (neutral, approaching but not at overbought) following the mid-July bounce.

Medium confidence

FX Leaders reported RSI at 35.58 on July 2 (close to oversold without a confirmed reversal); Investing.com's technical page subsequently showed RSI at 67.53, rated Neutral. The two readings are different-date snapshots consistent with the sharp early-July rebound.

The stock trades above its major moving averages after the rebound — above the 20-day EMA (~$143.75), 50-day EMA (~$133.76), 50-day SMA (~$130.05), and the 200-day moving average — with MACD turning positive on July 7, 2026.

Low confidence

Investing.com listed the 20-day EMA at 143.75, 50-day EMA at 133.76, and 50-day MA at 130.05 with buy signals, and Barchart-style aggregate signals showed MACD turning positive July 7; confidence is lowered because the sources' price snapshots were taken on different dates during a fast-moving week, so exact MA values may be slightly stale.

Sources (27)

Caveats

Time-sensitivity is high: prices, targets, and technicals are snapshots from July 15–16, 2026 during a fast-moving week (the stock jumped 4.47% on July 15), and the July 31 Q2 earnings report could invalidate much of this framing within two weeks. Data-quality concerns: nearly all figures come from secondary aggregators (stockanalysis.com, MarketBeat, TipRanks, GuruFocus, Investing.com) rather than primary sources — the SEC 8-K returned a 403 on direct fetch, so Q1 revenue is only bracketed at $83.16B–$85.14B across sources, and the only primary source directly confirmed is ExxonMobil's own Q1 press release ($4.2B, $1.00/share). The 5-year average P/E of ~13.3 rests on a search excerpt from fullratio.com (page fetch failed), the JPMorgan prior target ($173) is aggregator-sourced only, and moving-average values were captured on different dates and may be slightly stale (flagged low confidence). Consensus figures disagree materially across trackers ($152–$173 average targets on 20–31 analyst pools with different staleness windows), so no single upside number is reliable. Gaps: no segment-level detail beyond the Energy Products loss, no Guyana/LNG project specifics, no balance-sheet maturity schedule, no precise 6-month return figure, limited detail on the Texas redomicile and any M&A speculation implied by BofA's 'deal or no deal' comment, and no independent verification of the ~$85 Brent level or Hormuz ceasefire timeline beyond two trade-press sources.

This report is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice. No buy / sell / hold recommendation is made or implied.

Want this on your watchlist?

Add your own focus, pick a delivery speed, and get a source-verified report like this one.