Report date: 2026-07-16
Analysis focus
Provide a balanced, comprehensive analysis: fundamentals and valuation, the Wall Street view, technical posture, and the key forward risks and catalysts.
Summary
Findings (21)
TQQQ carries a net expense ratio of 0.82-0.84% (gross 0.97%), with a fee waiver in effect only through September 30, 2026, versus 0.18% for its unleveraged peer Invesco QQQ.
High confidenceProShares and stockanalysis.com report a 0.82-0.84% net / 0.97% gross expense ratio with the waiver expiring September 30, 2026 — a near-term catalyst for a modest cost increase if not renewed; stockanalysis.com shows QQQ at 0.18%, roughly 4.5x cheaper.
TQQQ's dividend yield is approximately 0.49-0.51% on trailing distributions of $0.38 per share, with the most recent quarterly distribution of $0.17123 paid June 30, 2026 (ex-date June 24, 2026); QQQ yields 0.42% by comparison.
High confidencestockanalysis.com's dividend page shows the $0.17123 June 30, 2026 payment and $0.38 TTM total; distributions derive from swap-collateral interest income and vary with short-term rates rather than reflecting a managed dividend policy, so quarter-to-quarter changes are not comparable to corporate dividend cuts or raises.
TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) trades at approximately $74.27-$74.44 per share as of July 15-16, 2026, with assets under management of roughly $34-36 billion.
High confidencestockanalysis.com shows a July 15, 2026 close of $74.44 and AUM of $33.96B; search results across sources cited a price of $74.27 and AUM near $36B as of July 16, 2026, with the small AUM spread reflecting different as-of dates.
Traditional company fundamentals — trailing/forward P/E, P/B, EV/EBITDA, revenue, EPS, free cash flow, and debt — are not applicable to TQQQ because it is a swap-based 3x-leveraged ETF holding index swaps with financial counterparties rather than an operating business; stockanalysis.com lists its P/E as 'n/a'.
High confidencestockanalysis.com explicitly lists P/E as n/a and describes the fund as holding 128 positions primarily through index swaps with major financial institutions; the SEC NPORT-P filing for ProShares Trust confirms the geared-fund structure. Valuation analysis therefore properly attaches to the underlying Nasdaq-100 index, not the fund itself.
TQQQ returned 77.10% total return over the trailing 12 months versus 29.66% for unleveraged peer QQQ — about 2.6x rather than 3x the index return, illustrating volatility-decay and fee drag inherent to daily-reset leverage.
High confidenceBoth figures are 12-month total returns including dividends from stockanalysis.com as of mid-July 2026. The shortfall versus a naive 3x multiple (which would imply ~89%) quantifies the compounding drag that makes long-horizon TQQQ outcomes path-dependent — the central structural bear point; conversely, the strong absolute return in a trending market is the core bull-case mechanism.
TQQQ has no direct Wall Street analyst coverage as of July 2026: zero Buy, zero Hold, and zero Sell ratings, and no consensus 12-month price target exists, because sell-side banks (Goldman, Morgan Stanley, JPM, BofA, Citi, etc.) do not publish ratings or targets on leveraged ETFs.
High confidenceSeeking Alpha's sell-side ratings page for TQQQ shows no analyst ratings or price targets, and MarketBeat confirms no direct Wall Street coverage — consistent with standard practice for 3x leveraged daily-reset products. This also means there have been no major-bank upgrades or downgrades of TQQQ itself in the last 90 days; rating activity flows only through its underlying Nasdaq-100 holdings.
TQQQ closed at $74.44 on July 15, 2026 (down 0.77% on the day), with a trailing 1-year total return of 77.1%, an expense ratio of 0.82%, assets of $33.96 billion, and a beta of 3.70.
High confidencestockanalysis.com's TQQQ page as of July 16, 2026 lists the $74.44 price, -0.58 daily change, 77.10% one-year return including dividends, 0.82% expense ratio, and $33.96B AUM; MarketBeat independently shows the same $74.44 last price as of the July 15 close.
TQQQ traded near $76.42 as of July 6, 2026, hovering essentially at its 50-day moving average (~$76.39) and about 12% above its 200-day moving average (~$68.09).
High confidenceStockInvest.us reported the $76.42 price on July 6, 2026; Investing.com's technical page lists the 50-day MA at 76.39 and 200-day MA at 68.09, both flagged as buy signals with the 50-day above the 200-day (a bullish longer-term structure), but the price sitting right on the 50-day indicates near-term momentum has stalled.
TQQQ's 52-week range is $37.32 to $88.09, meaning the fund roughly doubled off its 52-week low but has pulled back about 13% from its 52-week high as of early July 2026.
High confidenceBoth aggregators cite the $37.32–$88.09 52-week range; against the ~$76 early-July price, that implies a ~13% drawdown from the high — a large absolute move but modest by 3x-leveraged-fund standards.
The primary driver of TQQQ's rally was the underlying Nasdaq-100 surging more than 33% between March 30 and June 2, 2026, and gaining about 26% in the first half of 2026, powered by the AI infrastructure trade.
High confidenceThe sources document the March 30–June 2 Nasdaq-100 advance of 33%+ on renewed AI-trade confidence and the ~26% H1 2026 Nasdaq gain; because TQQQ delivers 3x the daily Nasdaq-100 return, this index move is mechanically the dominant driver of TQQQ's 6–12 month performance.
The underlying Nasdaq-100 index trades at a trailing P/E of 31.89 as of July 2026, above its long-term average of 28.9 and within a historical range of roughly 12.4 to 38.8; its forward P/E was 27.44 as of January 1, 2026.
Medium confidenceGuruFocus reports the 31.89 trailing P/E for July 2026 versus the 28.9 long-term average; Siblis Research provides the January 1, 2026 forward P/E of 27.44. This is the effective 'valuation' of TQQQ's exposure: multiples sit above average but below prior peaks — meaning TQQQ's 3x leverage is currently applied to an above-average, not extreme, starting valuation. Confidence is medium because the forward figure is six months stale and these are secondary aggregators.
The strongest bull case is continued Nasdaq-100 momentum in a low-volatility uptrend (where daily-reset compounding works in holders' favor, as in the past year's 77% return); the strongest bear case is that 3x leverage is applied at an above-average index multiple (31.9x trailing vs 28.9x average), where any sustained drawdown or choppy sideways market is magnified roughly threefold daily and compounding turns into decay.
Medium confidenceSynthesis of cited data: the 77.10% trailing return demonstrates the bull mechanism, the above-average index P/E frames the bear-side starting point, and ProShares' own documentation states the fund seeks 3x the index's daily return and is not intended for periods longer than one day without monitoring. What would change the conclusion: Nasdaq-100 multiples compressing back toward the ~28.9 average (reducing valuation risk), a sustained rise in realized volatility without direction (worsening decay), non-renewal of the fee waiver after September 30, 2026, or a rate shift altering swap-financing costs embedded in the fund.
MarketBeat's holdings-weighted aggregate rating for TQQQ is 'Moderate Buy' with a consensus score of 2.82, derived from 615 analyst ratings on 14 top portfolio companies representing about 17.8% of the fund, as of July 15-16, 2026.
High confidenceMarketBeat's TQQQ ratings page (updated July 16, 2026) computes a look-through rating from analyst coverage of underlying holdings, showing 2 Buy, 10 Moderate Buy, and 2 Hold aggregate company-level ratings. This is a secondary-source proxy, not direct coverage of the ETF.
Specific July 2026 catalysts and risk flags include the Broadcom–Apple partnership extension to 2031 lifting the Nasdaq-100 about 1.3%, Broadcom guiding Q3 AI semiconductor revenue up over 200% year-over-year to $16.0 billion, and Bloomberg reporting tech call options at their priciest relative to the S&P 500 since 2007 — a sign of speculative froth.
Medium confidenceBloomberg's July 2, 2026 piece documents call-option richness at 2007-era extremes (a contrarian froth signal directly relevant to a 3x leveraged long fund); tech-news coverage cites the Broadcom AI revenue guidance ($16.0B, +200% YoY) and the Broadcom-Apple 2031 extension that moved the Nasdaq-100 ~1.3%, both direct catalysts for TQQQ's underlying index.
The closest analyst-consensus proxy, the unleveraged QQQ (same Nasdaq-100 index), carries a TipRanks 'Strong Buy' consensus from 101 analysts (88 Buy, 12 Hold, 1 Sell) with an average 12-month price target of $857.18, a high of $1,108.68, and a low of $620.79 — roughly 19% above QQQ's July 15, 2026 close of $717.74.
Medium confidenceTipRanks aggregates 12-month targets on QQQ's underlying holdings issued in the past 3 months into an ETF-level consensus; the $717.74 QQQ close (July 15, 2026, per stockanalysis.com) implies ~19.4% consensus upside. Because TQQQ resets 3x leverage daily, this upside cannot be linearly tripled into a TQQQ target — path dependence and volatility decay break that arithmetic.
For TQQQ, 'valuation' cannot be assessed via analyst targets or P/E multiples on the fund itself; the relevant valuation lens is the underlying Nasdaq-100, where the Wall Street consensus view (per the QQQ proxy) labels the index 'Undervalued' relative to aggregated analyst targets, against which the fund's 0.82% expense ratio and daily-reset leverage act as structural drags.
Medium confidenceTipRanks marks QQQ as undervalued versus its $857.18 aggregated analyst target, while stockanalysis.com documents TQQQ's 3x daily-leverage structure and 0.82% fee. The bull case is that sustained low-volatility Nasdaq-100 uptrends compound TQQQ gains beyond 3x (evidenced by the 77% 1-year return vs. ~19% implied index upside); the bear case is that choppy or falling markets impose volatility decay that analyst targets on the underlying index do not capture.
TQQQ has returned approximately +74.7% over the trailing 12 months and +38.3% year-to-date through July 13, 2026 (with dividends reinvested), though a second aggregator pegs the 12-month change at +68.1%, reflecting minor date/methodology differences.
Medium confidenceFinanceCharts total-return data shows +74.66% TTM and +38.33% YTD through July 13, 2026; StockInvest.us shows a 12-month change of +68.07%. The spread between sources is expected for a 3x leveraged fund where a few days' difference in measurement window materially moves the figure.
RSI(14) readings for TQQQ are conflicting across sources — Investing.com showed ~69.0 (approaching but not yet overbought) while another aggregator showed ~49.9 (neutral) — consistent with momentum cooling from an overbought June into a neutral July.
Medium confidenceThe two secondary sources report materially different RSI(14) values (69.0 vs 49.9), likely reflecting different snapshot dates in early-to-mid July 2026; neither reading is in classical overbought (>70) or oversold (<30) territory, so the indicator is best characterized as neutral-to-warm.
Near-term technical support for TQQQ sits at ~$76.00 (accumulated volume), a $71.48–$71.83 weekly support zone, and $69.27 horizontal support; resistance sits at ~$77.19 and the long-term moving-average band near $78.37.
Medium confidenceStockInvest.us identifies accumulated-volume support at $76.01 and resistance at $77.19 and $78.37; ChartMill identifies a 71.48–71.83 multi-trendline support zone and $69.27 horizontal support. These are algorithmically derived levels from secondary sources, hence medium confidence.
A bearish short-term signal fired on July 6, 2026, when TQQQ's 10-day moving average crossed below its 50-day moving average, even as longer-horizon moving-average composites (12 buys, 0 sells on daily signals) remained bullish.
Medium confidenceAltIndex reported the 10/50-day bearish crossover dated July 06, 2026; Barchart-style composite signals in the same period still aggregated to Strong Buy on moving averages, capturing the tension between short-term loss of momentum and an intact medium-term uptrend.
Independent algorithmic (non-Wall-Street) forecast services project a 2026 average TQQQ price of $121.31 with a range of $90.25 to $152.37, but these are model-generated extrapolations, not analyst targets, and carry low reliability.
Low confidenceStockScan publishes algorithmic 2026 price projections for TQQQ in this range; such sites fill the vacuum left by absent sell-side coverage but use trend-extrapolation models with no fundamental grounding, so they should not be treated as Wall Street consensus. Included only to show what retail-facing 'target' figures circulate; the conclusion would change only if actual sell-side coverage of the ETF began, or if consensus targets on the underlying Nasdaq-100 holdings were materially cut (e.g., mega-cap downgrades by major banks) or raised.
Sources (25)
- https://stockanalysis.com/etf/tqqq/fundamentalsSecondary
- https://stockanalysis.com/etf/tqqq/dividend/fundamentalsSecondary
- https://stockanalysis.com/etf/qqq/fundamentalsSecondary
- https://www.proshares.com/our-etfs/leveraged-and-inverse/tqqqfundamentalsPrimary
- https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001174610/000207169126009283/GEARED.htmfundamentalsPrimary
- https://www.gurufocus.com/economic_indicators/6778/nasdaq-100-pe-ratiofundamentalsSecondary
- https://siblisresearch.com/data/nasdaq-100-pe-ratio/fundamentalsSecondary
- https://en.macromicro.me/series/23955/nasdaq-100-pefundamentalsSecondary
- https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NASDAQ/TQQQ/dividend/fundamentalsSecondary
- https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NASDAQ/TQQQ/ratings/analyst_targetsSecondary
- https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/TQQQ/ratings/sell-side-ratingsanalyst_targetsSecondary
- https://www.tipranks.com/etf/qqq/forecastanalyst_targetsSecondary
- https://stockscan.io/stocks/TQQQ/forecastanalyst_targetsUnreliable
- https://walletinvestor.com/fund-forecast/tqqq-fund-predictionanalyst_targetsUnreliable
- https://www.investing.com/etfs/proshares-trust-ultrapro-qqq-technicaltechnicalsSecondary
- https://stockinvest.us/stock/TQQQtechnicalsSecondary
- https://altindex.com/ticker/tqqq/technical-analysistechnicalsSecondary
- https://www.chartmill.com/stock/quote/TQQQ/technical-analysistechnicalsSecondary
- https://www.barchart.com/etfs-funds/quotes/TQQQ/technical-analysistechnicalsSecondary
- https://www.financecharts.com/etfs/TQQQ/performance/total-returntechnicalsSecondary
- https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-02/tech-rally-chasers-make-calls-priciest-since-2007-next-to-s-ptechnicalsSecondary
- https://247wallst.com/investing/2026/07/02/the-nasdaq-was-up-26-in-the-first-half-of-2026-these-3-ai-stocks-are-just-getting-started/technicalsSecondary
- https://www.fool.com/investing/2026/07/09/nasdaq-composite-jumps-09-as-semiconductors-rise/technicalsSecondary
- https://investingnews.com/top-tech-news/technicalsSecondary
- https://bingx.com/en/learn/article/nasdaq-100-nas100-outlook-and-price-prediction-is-nas100-a-good-investmenttechnicalsUnreliable
Caveats
Time-sensitivity is high: prices, technical levels, and moving averages are snapshots from July 6–16, 2026 and a 3x daily-leveraged fund can move far in days; the Nasdaq-100 forward P/E (27.44) is stale, dated January 1, 2026, and the trailing P/E comes from secondary aggregators (GuruFocus, Siblis) rather than primary sources [11]. Most price, return, and technical data derive from secondary aggregators (stockanalysis.com, MarketBeat, StockInvest.us, Investing.com, AltIndex, ChartMill, FinanceCharts) rather than primary filings; primary-source grounding is limited to ProShares' own fund page and the SEC NPORT-P geared-fund filing [1][4]. Sources conflict on several figures: trailing 12-month return (77.1% vs 74.7% vs 68.1%) [5][17], RSI(14) (69.0 vs 49.9) [18], and AUM ($33.96B vs ~$36B) [3] — differences attributed to as-of dates and methodology, not resolved to a single value. Analyst-view sections rely entirely on look-through proxies (MarketBeat holdings-weighted rating covers only ~17.8% of the fund; TipRanks QQQ consensus), since no direct sell-side coverage exists [6][13][15]; the algorithmic 2026 price projections are explicitly low-reliability model extrapolations [21]. Not covered: counterparty-level detail on the swap book beyond the NPORT-P structure confirmation, intraday liquidity/spread analysis, tax treatment of distributions, options-market positioning on TQQQ itself, and any scenario modeling of drawdown magnitudes under specific volatility regimes. Distribution-yield comparisons to corporate dividends are structurally invalid since payouts track swap-collateral interest and short-term rates [2]. Nothing here constitutes a buy, sell, or hold recommendation.
This report is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice. No buy / sell / hold recommendation is made or implied.